Recent messages

Doordat 2 items een verkeerde serie/helden naam hadden, heb ik die twee items per ongeluk opnieuw toegevoegd maar wel met betere afbeelding. Kun je de oude items verwijderen?
– 110474 mag weg (verzamelaars overhevelen naar 380325)
– 110476 mag weg (verzamelaars overhevelen naar 380351)

Because 2 items had a wrong series/hero name, I accidentally added those two items again, but with a better image. Can you delete the old items?
– 110474 may go (transfer collectors to 380325)
– 110476 may go (transfer collectors to 380351)

Think it only makes sense if both versions exist and then to a sufficient extent.
Otherwise it is better to keep them together and distinguish them with a “no addition” and notation of the details. But then it would be best to change the “album series” name
Didn't particularly study Tintin so I can't say what would be the best.
Not enough knowledge in the matter.
Feel free to give your idea about it. Maybe some administrators in this particular staging area can pick it up.
steven

Noticed a problem with the reprints of suske en wiske
How are we going to record several reprints in the same year?

I do not have the Helmond edition in my possession, but I despise that it is from 1969 at the earliest, based on the zip code…? With these kinds of differences between the year of imprint and the actual release, should something be mentioned under “details”?

Good point. Then we would have to make the explanation for adding images specific to each category. I will discuss with Marco whether that is possible.

Good points Willem.
M.b.t. 1: it is even better if we automatically remove the empty collection areas for which no alias or name variations have been entered. We will take care of that soon.
2. That is indeed useful because then you know that as an administrator you cannot simply reject the item. We will also make.

Thanks for the response everyone - seems clear to me!

If really purely the criteria of: “1 Catawiki number per issue” is used, then, for example, luxury albums of which only the type of numbering is different should not be included separately.
For example, I have from one and the same edition 3 different versions where only the numbering (which was added by hand by the publisher) is different. Ordinary luxury, employee copy and author copy. Enter as 1 expense or as 3?
As far as that Gaston item is concerned, that is indeed going a bit too far for me. That's something you include in your own notes and is just a measure of the state your album is in.
I just want to say (because of Kiekeboe sticker): 2 variants with a clear reference to each other. To be honest, I really don't see the problem of why that shouldn't be…

Ik heb er geen probleem mee dat er van één uitgave 2 versies worden opgenomen; ééntje met en ééntje zonder sticker dan.
Indien er voor gekozen wordt om bijlagen bij curiosa te stoppen, geen probleem mits dit consequent gebeurd.
Dan moet bijvoorbeeld deze bijlage ook als apart curiosa besproken worden, bijvoorbeeld:
linkje

I have no problem with 2 versions of one release being included; one with and one without sticker.
If you choose to stop attachments with curiosities, no problem if this is done consistently.
Then, for example, this appendix should also be discussed as a separate curiosity, for example:
link

I had rejected that Gaston item, of course with an explanation.
The item was already there.
And it goes a bit far to distinguish between unopened and opened items. That's just the same item, not a variant.
You can say that your own copy is unopened in the notes in your shop or collection, just as you can note it there if you have an album with a dedication or drawing. You can also place three extra images there.
So you can adapt it completely to your own situation, I think.

removed

removed

Hi Terry,
Something had indeed gone wrong in your collection. We have fixed this. It's okay now.
Thanks for signaling.
René

Hi Clemi,
You can of course put these and other 4 cards with the curiosities, and if you then make a reference in the content description for this comic item, then that is also covered, doesn't it?
Alkyoto

Nieuw op de site en een ongeopende versie van Guust en de philips batterijen bleek niet gewenst inderdaad – terwijl er in de huidige opzet geen ruimte meer is om de variant toe te voegen (3e foto terecht al gebruikt voor een van de kaarten). Maar het zal wel aan mijn persoonlijke binding met dit soort items liggen dat ik het belangrijk genoeg vind om te vermelden in een catalogus… ;-))
(voor item zie http://www.catawiki.nl/catalogus/Guust-en-de-ph…)

New on the site and an unopened version of Guust and the philips batteries turned out to be undesirable indeed - while in the current setup there is no longer room to add the variant (3rd photo rightly already used for one of the cards). But it must be my personal connection with this kind of item that I think it's important enough to mention in a catalog... ;-))
(for item see http://www.catawiki.nl/catalogus/Guust-en-de-ph… )

Hello Rene,
I am very satisfied with the site, but in my compilation lists I miss bernard prince and author hermann hopping. This while I have comanche and others from hermann in my collection list.
Can you fix this or have I done something wrong?
Gr. Terry

If that is the first edition, a second edition must be added and the first edition must then add something about the fact that it is a misprint that has largely been taken out of the market: ) If it cannot be copied go I will fill in again as soon as I have time; )

Hey.
I know this is an old thread, but I thought I'd give my opinion on it anyway.
Just to be clear, I'm assuming release number = barcode number?
I certainly understand what you are saying if you claim that the release number can give you a lot of useful information.
However, I want to make a side note. One of the cornerstones, so to speak, of my collection of music are CDs from underground groups who hand out their promo CDs at concerts, or offer them for sale on their website from their own account.
That is a large part of my collection that does not have a barcode number at all. In your proposal, what would be the correct method to add these types of CDs to the catalog?

About the naming: it is somewhat confusing that the “round spine” is mentioned in the category of the 1st HC series, because there are also albums with a flat spine in between and it does not seem useful to me there is a separate category for this (are now also under “round back”)

Hoi Clemni,
Hier staat volgens mij de eerste druk aan. Het is helaas nog niet mogelijk items te kopiëren naar een nieuw item zodat velden niet opnieuw ingevuld hoeven te worden. Dit staat wel hoog op onze ToDo. Komt er aan.
René

Hi Clemni,
I think this is the first printing. Unfortunately, it is not yet possible to copy items to a new item so that fields do not have to be filled in again. This is high on our ToDo. Coming.
Rene

Can this album be copied, whereby a second or new first edition is created? I would like to add a scan of the rejected first edition, but then I must add a second edition (which is otherwise identical). Probably most users have the second edition? I can also add a whole new album, but everything has to be filled in again :-)

At the moment only the wood-containing version is there, while I assume most people have the wood-free version - otherwise the same of course… Can it be copied to correct it? (just new, so still trying to find out how to change / make suggestions)

Photo and description changed at the first edition - was a photo of the second (?) edition. If I am going to add more photos I will play around with the scanner etc. to get nicer cut pictures on it. Nice initiative iig, this site!

It would not be appropriate to include this as a curiosa “quartet” with the album wrapped in the foil as the second image, each with a “no addition” for each album that is included in the packaging.
The big question will be what we will do with promotions where multiple albums are packaged together. See the “dupuis promo edition”
I also see a problem with stickers, this can be done by a retailer as a promo action.
More specifically, where an item belongs will depend on the collection objective.
For example, the quartet, the item to be collected is not the album. so under curiosities (will they not search under quartet to know which albums were included with the item? And would they not prefer to see which possible albums were packaged with the quartet?)
eg 2 wraps with album lombard is the album that takes precedence (everyone is looking for the album and it seems useful to me to know that there was originally a wrapper)
steven

Hi Experiment626,
Can you indicate what the criterion is for you to include or not include such publications in your collection? Maybe we can handle that on the site. Or could you also live with including those quartets as curiosities.
René