Stamps/remove stamps from the catalog12 messages

Dear people, if stamps are removed from the catalog on this basis, as below, then I think this is an incorrect way, after all it is unclear to me which stamp has been removed, the lack of the country and number is total unclear.

Please mention item number of the original item would be a plus.

Dear friend,

Nice to see that you are active on Catawiki! Unfortunately, the new item - Map of the Federation - that you entered cannot be included in the catalog because the item is already in the catalog.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Let me know if you have any questions about this.

That email came from me. Sometimes I forget to write down a number and put it in the rejection e-mail.

The main cause is people who do not search and simply leave filling in / supplementing data to the scarce administrators.

You come across some "sellers" very often.

Dick, it's not about what you think is the root cause, you just can't forget the item number, you're messing up the seller's records on this basis.

I just can't see which stamp you removed, so in other words it could also be that it wasn't a duplicate.

Mistakes are human, Aart.

There are only 4 stamps with that name, so you should be able to find yours fairly easily with your administration, I think.

Arco, I've seen those 4, but I don't have those stamps.

Incidentally, Dick also removed the previous stamp from me as a duplication, but then it turned out that he had also looked wrong, after all the perforation was different then.

how many mistakes a person can make to fulfill this task.

Preferably slightly less than normal users. (;-)

Deze dan, 2955725 staat iets lager, en heeft een andere naam.

This one, 2955725 , is slightly lower, and has a different name.

Facerco, I don't have that either.

I have also checked other countries, but let it go.

I run into him every once in a while

If it happened recently, it should still be found under "Disapproved" in the Completed reviews section of the admin page.

I had searched there, but found it not .

Incidentally, the stamp in question now still occurs 4 times. There are two varieties of perforation, T 13 and T 13 x 12.5. So remove two more duplicates.

Permanent numbers are 2422081 and 2425741, duplicates are numbers 5428547 and 7159239.

I don't know the number of Aart's stamp, but it was in any case higher than the keepers. That means that he has not looked well. Upon which? I would like to know.

What is this now Dick, are you now trying to blame me "for not looking well. I searched for you stating only a name of a series apparently, and therefore only have those 4 found that also mention Arco.

But only because you did not include an item number, so not my fault, but your fault for forgetting this.

By the way, the numbers 5428547 and 7159239 are not duplicates

5428547 has a different WM

en 7159239 has a different perforation

and number 2422081 is a cigar band

That's what I mean Dick, about looking closely and looking for the differences to mention duplicates.

Especially in times when we need to have / give a little bit of trust and support, the emotion arises here.
Can we get the old times back from the heated discussions / quarrels in the Stamp section?